The ute segment is running red-hot right now, and there’s no shortage of newcomers looking to steal a slice of the gigantic sales pie in Australia.

One such upstart is the Kia Tasman, the first body-on-frame dual cab for the South Korean automaker, and one that’s already polarizing punters with its unique styling. However, metrics often matter more than aesthetics in this segment, so how does the Tasman tally up when you put it next to its core segment rivals?

There’s another East-Asian challenger entering the ring too, in the form of the BYD Shark 6. The BYD brand might still be in nappies, but it’s already gunning for market share with a boundary-pushing plug-in hybrid offering that’s already lodged thousands of orders before deliveries have even started. Are Aussies finally ready to embrace electrified utes in a big way? As with the Tasman, the Shark 6 will need to deliver on some critical numbers if it’s to attain true staying power in this ultra-competitive market.

To help you figure out the pecking order – and decide which of these new utes fits your needs better – we’ve arranged this helpful data matrix. With both the Tasman and Shark 6 being so new (the Tasman isn’t due to arrive until mid-2025), there are a few knowledge gaps, critically around both of their Gross Combination Masses (GCM), which means calculating their true worth as trailer-haulers is a little difficult.

But there’s definitely one thing to note about the BYD and the Kia: They’re massive. That Shark 6 in particular, which is the longest, widest and tallest of this bunch by considerable margins, but even the Kia eclipses something as sizable as a Ford Ranger. How do they do they measure in terms of cargo-carrying capacity though?

Alongside the Kia and BYD, we’ve put the stats for four segment favourites so you can see how the new arrivals stack up against stalwarts like the Toyota Hilux, Ford Ranger, Isuzu D-Max and Mitsubishi Triton. Also, we’ve gone ahead and done the maths on your behalf so you can see just how much each of them can carry when either at their maximum rated payload, or their maximum rated tow weight.

Size

TasmanShark 6RangerHiluxTritonD-Max
Length5410mm5457mm5370mm5325mm5320mm5280mm
Width1930mm1971mm1918mm1855mm1865mm1870mm
Height1890mm1925mm1886mm1865mm1795mm1785mm
Wheelbase3270mm2920mm3270mm3085mm3130mm3125mm
Ground Clearance224mm230mm234mm216mm228mm235mm
ApproachUnknown31.030.029.030.430.0
DepartureUnknown19.323.027.022.823.9
Ramp-overUnknown17.021.0Unknown23.423.3
Wading depth800mm700mm800mm700mmUnknown800mm

Tub dimensions

TasmanShark 6RangerHiluxTritonD-Max
Length1512mm1520mm1450mm1570mm*1555mm1570mm
Width1572mm1500mm1520mm1645mm*1545mm1530mm
Height540mm517mm525mm495mm*525mm490mm*
Between arches1186mmunknown1217mm1105mm*1135mm1122mm

Mechanical

TasmanShark 6RangerHiluxTritonD-Max
Power154kW321kW154kW150kW150kW140kW
Torque441Nm650Nm500Nm500Nm470Nm450Nm
Gearbox8sp auto1sp electric10sp auto6sp auto6sp auto6sp auto

Towing

TasmanShark 6RangerHiluxTritonD-Max
Kerb weightUnknown2710kg2276kg2150kg2125kg2030kg
Max tow rating3500kg2500kg3500kg3500kg3500kg3500kg
GVMUnknown3500kg3230kg3050kg3200kg3100kg
GCMUnknownUnknown6350kg5850kg6250kg6000kg
Max payload1017kg790kg954kg900kg1075kg1070kg
Payload at max trailer weightUnknownUnknown574kg200kg625kg470kg
Trailer weight at max payloadUnknownUnknown3120kg2800kg3050kg2900kg

* denotes information sourced from a non-OEM dataset.